Skip to content

compose: clarify cloud provider portability section#24423

Merged
dvdksn merged 2 commits intodocker:mainfrom
dvdksn:fix/issue-24257-cloud-provider-clarity
Apr 2, 2026
Merged

compose: clarify cloud provider portability section#24423
dvdksn merged 2 commits intodocker:mainfrom
dvdksn:fix/issue-24257-cloud-provider-clarity

Conversation

@dvdksn
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@dvdksn dvdksn commented Mar 19, 2026

Summary

  • Rewrite the "Cloud providers" section to explain that the Compose models specification enables portability for platforms that implement it, rather than implying specific named cloud providers currently support it
  • Remove vague "compatible cloud providers" reference from Prerequisites
  • Change "Cloud providers might" to "A platform might" to reflect this is a specification-level feature

Closes #24257

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Remove vague references to unnamed "compatible cloud providers".
Rewrite the Cloud providers section to explain that the Compose models
specification enables portability for platforms that implement it.
Simplify Prerequisites to only mention Docker Model Runner.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <[email protected]>
@netlify
Copy link
Copy Markdown

netlify bot commented Mar 19, 2026

Deploy Preview for docsdocker ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 334b9ac
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/docsdocker/deploys/69cdeec08769c1000855068d
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-24423--docsdocker.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@docker-agent docker-agent bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Assessment: 🟢 APPROVE

This PR successfully clarifies the cloud provider portability section by reframing it as a specification-level feature rather than implying specific cloud providers currently support it. The changes improve accuracy and align with the stated goal of the PR.

No critical or notable issues found. The documentation changes are clear, accurate, and follow the style guidelines.

@dvdksn dvdksn requested a review from a team March 19, 2026 12:10
@dvdksn dvdksn added the status/review Pull requests that are ready for review label Mar 19, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@craig-osterhout craig-osterhout left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Just nitpicks

Co-authored-by: Craig Osterhout <[email protected]>
@dvdksn dvdksn enabled auto-merge (squash) April 2, 2026 04:24
@dvdksn dvdksn merged commit 5f68f62 into docker:main Apr 2, 2026
14 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area/ai status/review Pull requests that are ready for review

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[docs-scanner] Vague reference to cloud providers without specifics

2 participants